Bill Rancic Defends His Wife Giuliana After Fashion Police Controversy: 'I Tried to Get Them to Release the Footage' 41 years, 2,185 covers and 55,435 stories from PEOPLE magazine's history for you to enjoy
- Taylor Swift Has an Early Fourth of July Party – And It's as Amazing as You Think It Would Be
- Read the Cover Story: Growing Up Kennedy!
Exclusive Family Photos from White House Nanny
- Gigi Hadid Got All Her Prom Dresses from Her Mom Yolanda's Closet!
- Heroes Among Us: Crusading Against Autism
- Taylor Kitsch Talks Thrill-Seeking with Navy SEAL Friends
On Newsstands Now
- Matthew McConaughey: In His Own Words
- Jessa Duggar's Wedding Album
- Brittany Maynard's Final Days
Pick up your copy on newsstands
Click here for instant access to the Digital Magazine
People Top 5
LAST UPDATE: Tuesday February 10, 2015 01:10PM EST
PEOPLE Top 5 are the most-viewed stories on the site over the past three days, updated every 60 minutes
- May 02, 1988
- Vol. 29
- No. 17
Sued by Mcdonald's, a Santa Cruz Eatery Refuses to Cowtow
This isn't the first time these small fries have sparred with the giant. When the two former yoga teachers opened the restaurant in 1982, their idea was to pair convenience with healthy food, so they combined the "Mc" of fast-food fame with dharma, Sanskrit for "virtue." Seeing it more as a vice, McDonald's blocked the use of McDharma's as a legal trademark in 1984 and threatened suit in 1986. Prather and Shapiro settled out of court in February 1987, accepting an undisclosed sum from McDonald's ("It was enough," says Shapiro, "for a couple of burgers, some fries and a shake") to change their name. The partners listed the beanery as Dharma's in the phone book and painted the international symbol for "forbidden"—a red circle with a diagonal slash—over the "Mc" on their sign. "It was just a joke," says Shapiro.
McDonald's isn't laughing. According to its 1987 agreement with the two owners, "McDonald's is the exclusive owner of the 'Mc' mark for restaurant services." Adds John Onoda, McDonald's director of media relations: "McDharma's has breached the agreement." Prather and Shapiro, who must answer the complaint by May 3, disagree. They vow to defend themselves in court on grounds of freedom of speech. Just in case they lose, however, they're considering new names. "How about Dharma King?" suggests Shapiro. "Or Dharma-in-a-Box?"
Treat Yourself! 4 Preview Issues
The most buzzed about stars this minute!