Archive Homepage - 5/1/09 35 years, 1,872 covers and 48,700 stories from PEOPLE magazine's history for you to enjoy
Latest News!
- Source: Julianne Hough and Chuck Wicks Split
- FIRST LOOK: Heather Locklear's Fierce Return to Melrose Place
- Michael Jackson Laid to Rest in a $35,000 Suit
- Levi Johnston: My All-Out Fight for Tripp
- Expectant Jenna Elfman: I Still Feel Sexy
- Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's Son Helps Him Deal with Cancer Diagnosis
- Kristin Has a New Man – And He's Audrina's Other Ex!
People Top 5
LAST UPDATE: Tuesday November 10, 2009 11:10PM EST
PEOPLE Top 5 are the most-viewed stories on the site over the past three days, updated every 60 minutes
- April 29, 1991
- Vol. 35
- No. 16
Honey, Cover the Kids' Eyes! It's An Infomercial!
Hawking Makeup, Memory Tapes and a Host of Other Products, Brand-Name Stars Are Cashing in with Show-Length Commercials Disguised as Entertainment
ON FIRST VIEWING, AN INFOMERCIAL may seem as strange a beast as, say, a game-show miniseries. But these half hour-long hybrids of advertising and programming, already familiar to late-night insomniacs, are popping up more frequently in daytime hours on cable and broadcast channels, usually as ersatz talk shows or newsmagazines. Everyone has mistaken couch-perched Ali MacGraw and Meredith Baxter for standard talk show guests—until the talk about cosmetics went on and on and on.
Infomercials were born in 1984, when the government ended its 12-minute-per-hour limit on TV ads. Six years later, the "shows" (for which the infomercialist buys the airtime) were raking in a reported $500 million in sales of products, some costing up to $180.
Stars are singing hosannas to financial plans, car wax, male-potency preparations and weight-loss systems. Why? Mostly, it's not to bolster sagging careers but, as an infomercial might put it, "to maximize hidden earning potential." According to Greg Renker, president of Guthy-Renker Corp., a major producer of the ads, participating celebrities might be paid as little as $5,000 up front but can earn a big chunk based on sales generated by the spots.
There have been grumblings, both from consumers and the Federal Trade Commission, about unfounded claims made for some products (for instance, a diet-device "show" featuring Michael Reagan was withdrawn after an FTC challenge). And infomercials haven't always been labeled as such. So the National Infomercial Marketing Association—a self-monitoring (but technically powerless) group of producers—has recommended that, at the least, these shows should carry a label.
Meanwhile, one cable network has plans for an infomercial channel. Now, that's a beast.
Infomercials were born in 1984, when the government ended its 12-minute-per-hour limit on TV ads. Six years later, the "shows" (for which the infomercialist buys the airtime) were raking in a reported $500 million in sales of products, some costing up to $180.
Stars are singing hosannas to financial plans, car wax, male-potency preparations and weight-loss systems. Why? Mostly, it's not to bolster sagging careers but, as an infomercial might put it, "to maximize hidden earning potential." According to Greg Renker, president of Guthy-Renker Corp., a major producer of the ads, participating celebrities might be paid as little as $5,000 up front but can earn a big chunk based on sales generated by the spots.
There have been grumblings, both from consumers and the Federal Trade Commission, about unfounded claims made for some products (for instance, a diet-device "show" featuring Michael Reagan was withdrawn after an FTC challenge). And infomercials haven't always been labeled as such. So the National Infomercial Marketing Association—a self-monitoring (but technically powerless) group of producers—has recommended that, at the least, these shows should carry a label.
Meanwhile, one cable network has plans for an infomercial channel. Now, that's a beast.
More in the Archive
Advertisement
Cover Collections View All
Today's Photos
Treat Yourself! 4 Preview Issues
The most buzzed about stars this minute!
Promotion














