Bill Rancic Defends His Wife Giuliana After Fashion Police Controversy: 'I Tried to Get Them to Release the Footage' 41 years, 2,187 covers and 55,435 stories from PEOPLE magazine's history for you to enjoy
- Tom Brady Sues The NFL in Federal Court Over 'Deflategate' Suspension
- Read the Cover Story: Inside Blake & Miranda's Shocking Split
- Vincent Van Gogh Remembered on 125th Anniversary of His Death With Portrait Made from 50,000 Flowers
- Law & Order Director Arrested on Child Pornography Charges
- Kentucky Man Faces Felony Charges After Shooting Down Drone (Video)
On Newsstands Now
- Matthew McConaughey: In His Own Words
- Jessa Duggar's Wedding Album
- Brittany Maynard's Final Days
Pick up your copy on newsstands
Click here for instant access to the Digital Magazine
People Top 5
LAST UPDATE: Tuesday February 10, 2015 01:10PM EST
PEOPLE Top 5 are the most-viewed stories on the site over the past three days, updated every 60 minutes
- November 01, 2004
- Vol. 62
- No. 18
The Puzzle of Liz Taylor's Van Gogh
Heirs of a Jewish Collector in Nazi Germany Sue the Star for a Painting They Say Belongs to Them
Now Orkin and three relatives are fighting to get something back—and find themselves pitted against an unlikely opponent: Elizabeth Taylor. On Oct. 13, the family sued the Hollywood actress under the terms of the 1998 Holocaust Victims Redress Act in an attempt to recover a Van Gogh painting that once belonged to Mauthner. Orkin contends that Nazi persecution forced Mauthner to sell or surrender the canvas, View of the Asylum and Chapel at Saint-Rémy, which Taylor subsequently acquired at a 1963 London auction. A Taylor spokesperson declined comment, but after asking a court in May to name her the rightful owner, the actress said in a statement she had "not been presented with any information that suggests the painting was ever in Nazi possession."
That's not the point, says Orkin. When Taylor's father, Francis, an art dealer, bought the painting on her behalf for $257,600, three catalogues listed Mauthner (who died in 1947) as a previous owner without explaining when or how the work was transferred to later owners. Although the family doesn't have records to prove the Nazis actually seized the Van Gogh directly from Mauthner, they insist she was forced to give it up at a time when official persecution forced German Jews to sell off assets. That maybe, says Toronto attorney Bonnie Czegledi, a specialist in heritage law, but when Taylor bought the Van Gogh "this was not an issue that was on anybody's radar screen."
Whether Orkin can prove his case remains for a court to decide. But Czegledi says that in her opinion negotiated agreements in which disputed works end up going to a museum or charity are the most satisfactory outcomes of all. "That way," she says, "something very good can come of something very tragic."
Treat Yourself! 4 Preview Issues
The most buzzed about stars this minute!