Thousands of 'toxic Time Bombs' Are Waiting to Explode, Warns Author Michael Brown
updated 05/19/1980 AT 01:00 AM EDT
•originally published 05/19/1980 AT 01:00 AM EDT
In the wake of the explosion, has the danger passed in the Elizabeth area?
No. It's potentially as dangerous as Three Mile Island. That dump contained nitroglycerine, TNT, PCBs—which may cause birth defects—and compounds that could explode on contact with air and water. Tests showed only slight levels of poisonous wastes in the air, but dioxin, a highly poisonous substance used in the Vietnam defoliant Agent Orange, might have been present—and no easy test can detect it. Officials called the alert off too soon. No one really knew what was there.
Are there other Elizabeths waiting to happen?
Definitely. The Environmental Protection Agency says there are at least 51,000 dump sites in the country. I feel that thousands of these are toxic time bombs.
Is an explosion the worst thing that can happen at these storage sites?
Fire and explosion are an imminent danger, but the biggest threat is to underground water. A toxic waste landfill of 17 acres can contaminate a billion gallons of subterranean water in a decade.
What harm can this cause?
Birth defects. Near Love Canal the streets had signs warning motorists of deaf children. Some children grew up with no tooth enamel. In most places, it is the women who stand up against these dumps. They are the ones who have miscarriages, deformed babies and kids who get sick.
Doesn't the government regulate dump sites?
According to federal procedures, dump sites are supposed to be dug in "impermeable" clay, the pit lined with a tough plastic, and the barrels covered with clay and grass to prevent erosion. Just last week the Environmental Protection Agency issued an additional set of regulations for dump sites, but Elizabeth was not a dump site to begin with. It was technically a "recycling center."
How safe are the approved dump sites?
Two years ago the EPA tested 50 sites with no known problems. They found that chemicals from 47 of them had contaminated the ground water. No one has ever proved that so-called "secure" landfills will be secure after 10 years. Industry often cuts corners—and the corners it cuts are important. The best alternative is high-temperature incineration—at least 2,000° F.
Who controls the toxic waste disposal industry?
Nobody doubts that organized crime is involved to some degree. Some people who have created unsafe situations have arrest records for things like gambling and possession of stolen goods. Some of these waste haulers are said to be in the business because it's a good way to smuggle drugs across the Canadian border to American dump sites. No Customs agent in his right mind is going to stick his hand in a barrel marked "PCB."
Can waste disposal be regulated?
Not right now. How can you check every drum going into a disposal plant? The Resources Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 sets standards for active landfills and may stop a lot of midnight dumping, but it is a limited piece of legislation fraught with loopholes and not yet fully implemented.
What is the long-term solution?
The solution is to use various chemical processes to break down the toxicants into simple molecules that can be released safely into the environment. The only true answer is for industry to spend the research dollars to neutralize these compounds.
Won't these research costs be passed on to the consumer?
People should realize that spending money on this cleanup now will save the country money in the long run. Medical costs will just get higher if they don't.