Latest News
- Top StoryCeline Dion's Struggle for a Second Baby
- Johnny Depp's Girlfriend Wouldn't Change a Thing About Him
- Ashton Celebrates His Birthday with the SNL Cast!
- Meet Snooki's New Boyfriend
- Nicole Richie & Joel Madden Celebrate Opening of New Playground
- Movie Wife: Vince Vaughn to Make 'Wonderful Real Husband'
- Brooklyn Decker's Swimsuit Issue Beauty Secrets Revealed
- Naomi Judd Defends Taylor Swift
- Nancy Kerrigan's Father's Death to Be Treated as a Homicide
- Ellen Reveals Her Approach to American Idol – and Simon Cowell
- Angelina Jolie Visits Haiti Earthquake Survivors
Top Five Most Read Stories This Week
LAST UPDATE: Wednesday February 10, 2010 07:10AM EST
PEOPLE Top 5 are the most-viewed stories on the site over the past three days, updated every 60 minutes
Martha Stewart may be digging a little deeper into her kitchen cupboard. New York's Division of Tax Appeals has ordered the publicly-traded domestic doyenne to pay $221,677 in back homeowner's taxes for 1991 and 1992. Stewart, who maintains homes in East Hampton, N.Y., and Westport, Conn., claimed that she did not live in New York for more than six months in 1992. (Those who live within the state for half a year or more are responsible for state income taxes.) Stewart, who's been a resident of Connecticut since 1971, "believes that she was unfairly taxed by the state of New York during the years in question," her publicist said in a statement. Administrative Law Judge Thomas Sacca disagrees; he ruled that Stewart was a New York resident in 1992 and earned taxable income in the state the year before. Stewart intends to appeal.
PeopleTVJessica Alba and Ellen Play a Hot Game
Get PEOPLE Everywhere
Advertisement
Today's Latest Photos 02.10.10
Promotion
Treat Yourself! 4 Preview Issues
Today!




