Latest News
- Top StoryMeet Snooki's New Boyfriend
- Nicole Richie & Joel Madden Celebrate Opening of New Playground
- Movie Wife: Vince Vaughn to Make 'Wonderful Real Husband'
- Brooklyn Decker's Swimsuit Issue Beauty Secrets Revealed
- Naomi Judd Defends Taylor Swift
- Nancy Kerrigan's Father's Death to Be Treated as a Homicide
- Ellen Reveals Her Approach to American Idol – and Simon Cowell
- Angelina Jolie Visits Haiti Earthquake Survivors
- Jen Aniston Explains Her Affection for Gerard Butler
- Anne Hathaway: I'm Not Very Pretty
- Tiger & Elin's Wedding Pastor Predicts: It Will Work Out
Top Five Most Read Stories This Week
LAST UPDATE: Wednesday February 10, 2010 03:10AM EST
PEOPLE Top 5 are the most-viewed stories on the site over the past three days, updated every 60 minutes
Despite the marathon length and a lack of a blockbuster nominated movie to grab anyone's attention, the Oscars still drew a crowd. An estimated 46.3 million TV viewers watched the broadcast, according to preliminary Nielsen ratings. That's a 2% increase over last year's audience of 45.6 million, but still well below the 55 million who tuned in to see "Titanic" sweep the awards in 1998. As might be expected, TV critics turned thumbs down on the long, long show. Caryn James of The New York Times called this year's telecast "a zombie, as if some pod creature had sucked the life out of it." Tom Shales of The Washington Post considered the show "miserably flat, a victim of its own ponderousness and the incredible pomposity of individual winners." The Times didn't even care for this year's Oscar fashions, which the paper found banal. Said the banner headline: "Oscar style? Well, they all wore clothes."
PeopleTVJessica Alba and Ellen Play a Hot Game
Get PEOPLE Everywhere
Advertisement
Today's Latest Photos 02.09.10
Promotion
Treat Yourself! 4 Preview Issues
Today!




