Latest News!
- Five Ways to Get Tickets for Obama's Inauguration
- Madonna & A-Rod Head to Mexico City
- Divorce Drama for Amy Winehouse?
- Ricki Lake: 'I Can't Believe I Was Fat'
- Travis Barker, DJ AM to Play New Year's Eve Concert
- VIDEO: Britney Celebrates Birthday Early in the U.K.
- For Sale: Leonardo DiCaprio's Malibu Estate
People Top 5
LAST UPDATE: Monday December 01, 2008 11:10AM EST
PEOPLE Top 5 are the most-viewed stories on the site over the past three days, updated every 60 minutes
Critics Love Jackman, But Not His Show
"X-Men" star Hugh Jackman wows Broadway reviewers, but "The Boy from Oz," his musical show about Peter Allen, takes a bad pounding.
Originally posted Friday October 17, 2003 10:45 AM EDT
Hunky Hugh Jackman, whose mere presence as the lead in "The Boy from Oz," helped generate a $10 million box-office advance for the new musical, opened on Broadway Thursday night.
The critics collectively adored him as the late Australian singer-songwriter Peter Allen. And, just as collectively, they scorned the material he's saddled with.
"Let's make this simple," writes Clive Barnes in the Post. "The show's plus is its superstar. The show's minus is the show itself."
"As a show, 'The Boy From Oz' sometimes seems like an expanded drag act," writes Howard Kissel in the News, while the headline on Michael Kuchwara's Associated Press story bluntly states, "Hugh Jackman Can't Save 'Boy From Oz.'"
As for The New York Times, generally considered to be the final word on theater, critic Ben Brantley, in his review, ponders how an "able-bodied, infinitely appealing young man" like the "X-Men" star can bear to carry the "burden" of such an "indisputably bogus" and "pathetic" show as "Oz."
"Don't even get me started on the aspiring clever double entendres that pass for sophisticated dialogue," Brantley says of Martin Sherman's book, which, the Wall Street Journal's Terry Teachout considers "the theatrical equivalent of a cheesy TV movie." (Teachout does concede that his female friends consider Jackman "babelicious.")
The Washington Post's Peter Marks thinks the entire endeavor just should have been called "Hugh Jackman's Chest Hair! The Musical."
Before the opening, Jackman, 34, told Show People magazine (no relation to PEOPLE): "Peter is an amazing part. He was cheeky, and could be catty and nasty. He slept with women and men, whomever, whenever. ... Everything about him was 'aahhhh.'"
How the critical reaction will ultimately affect "The Boy from Oz" remains to be seen. Traditionally, when a star of Jackman's magnitude leaves a weak show (a classic example is "Coco," which starred Katharine Hepburn in 1970, since really big movie marquee names rarely go to Broadway), the closing notice promptly goes up.
Jackman is reportedly committed to "Oz" for one year.
The critics collectively adored him as the late Australian singer-songwriter Peter Allen. And, just as collectively, they scorned the material he's saddled with.
"Let's make this simple," writes Clive Barnes in the Post. "The show's plus is its superstar. The show's minus is the show itself."
"As a show, 'The Boy From Oz' sometimes seems like an expanded drag act," writes Howard Kissel in the News, while the headline on Michael Kuchwara's Associated Press story bluntly states, "Hugh Jackman Can't Save 'Boy From Oz.'"
As for The New York Times, generally considered to be the final word on theater, critic Ben Brantley, in his review, ponders how an "able-bodied, infinitely appealing young man" like the "X-Men" star can bear to carry the "burden" of such an "indisputably bogus" and "pathetic" show as "Oz."
"Don't even get me started on the aspiring clever double entendres that pass for sophisticated dialogue," Brantley says of Martin Sherman's book, which, the Wall Street Journal's Terry Teachout considers "the theatrical equivalent of a cheesy TV movie." (Teachout does concede that his female friends consider Jackman "babelicious.")
The Washington Post's Peter Marks thinks the entire endeavor just should have been called "Hugh Jackman's Chest Hair! The Musical."
Before the opening, Jackman, 34, told Show People magazine (no relation to PEOPLE): "Peter is an amazing part. He was cheeky, and could be catty and nasty. He slept with women and men, whomever, whenever. ... Everything about him was 'aahhhh.'"
How the critical reaction will ultimately affect "The Boy from Oz" remains to be seen. Traditionally, when a star of Jackman's magnitude leaves a weak show (a classic example is "Coco," which starred Katharine Hepburn in 1970, since really big movie marquee names rarely go to Broadway), the closing notice promptly goes up.
Jackman is reportedly committed to "Oz" for one year.
Check out more on... Hugh Jackman
Latest video
Dancing: Celebrate Brooke Burke's Victory!
Our man Griffin salutes the hot mama and recaps the sexiest, scariest and silliest moments of the past season
Advertisement
Today's Photos
What's Hot on People.com
Promotion
Treat Yourself! 4 Preview Issues
















