Latest News!
- Misty May-Treanor Undergoes Surgery
- Inside Ashlee's 'White-Trash' Birthday Bash
- Peter Cook Speaks Out About Christie Brinkley Divorce
- FIRST LOOK: Britney's 'Womanizer' Video
- Jimmy Kimmel and Sarah Silverman Are Back On!
- Derek Hough: I'm Living with Shannon Elizabeth
- Post-Rehab, David Duchovny Steps Out with Téa Leoni
People Top 5
LAST UPDATE: Tuesday October 07, 2008 08:10PM EDT
PEOPLE Top 5 are the most-viewed stories on the site over the past three days, updated every 60 minutes
'Passion' Premiere Splits Audiences
Is Mel Gibson's controversial new film about the last 12 hours of Christ's life a good movie? That depends on whom you ask.
Originally posted Wednesday February 25, 2004 07:03 PM EST
Mel Gibson says he didn't expect such a strong response from his new film "The Passion of the Christ." But as the controversial and violent movie opens in 2,800 theaters today, it is stirring some passionate thoughts from movie goers who watched early screenings.
"I didn't expect the ferocity of controversy. Religious themes do hit a nerve, but I didn't know I'd cut a main artery," Gibson said prior to his film's Ash Wednesday opening, Variety reports.
Still, the reviews are mixed, both from critics (whose early reviews have bashed the film's unrelenting violence and overall lack of context) and movie goers themselves.
"When you see the sacrifice that Jesus made, it makes you feel like, 'I have to do something better with my life,'" said Arch Bonnema, 50, a financial planner for a Texas church who donated $42,000 of his own money to screen the film for audiences, the Associated Press reports.
However, many Jewish audiences have had an entirely different reaction to the film, claiming that not only does the movie portray Jews poorly, but also that it could ratchet up anti-Semitic actions.
"I don't have any doubt this film will cause anti-Semitism," Dov Hikind, a Democratic assemblyman from Brooklyn, N.Y., told Reuters. "I don't have any doubt that this film will result in violence."
Meanwhile, some biblical scholars have taken exception to the historical accuracy of Gibson's movie. Among the criticisms are characters who speak in Latin. According to some historians, the correct language would have been Greek. (The film is in Latin and Aramaic with English subtitles.)
More upsetting to some was the absence of historical context, Reuters reports. "The lack of context is the most devastating thing for anyone who says (the film) is faithful to the gospels because the gospels have the context," John Dominic Crossan, a professor of religious studies at De Paul University, tells Reuters.
Gibson has countered such claims saying that he sought input from numerous religious scholars and other theologians. But where the gospels were not clear, he said, he trusted his own vision. "Since the experts canceled each other out, I was thrown back on my own resources to weigh the arguments and decide for myself," he said.
"I didn't expect the ferocity of controversy. Religious themes do hit a nerve, but I didn't know I'd cut a main artery," Gibson said prior to his film's Ash Wednesday opening, Variety reports.
Still, the reviews are mixed, both from critics (whose early reviews have bashed the film's unrelenting violence and overall lack of context) and movie goers themselves.
"When you see the sacrifice that Jesus made, it makes you feel like, 'I have to do something better with my life,'" said Arch Bonnema, 50, a financial planner for a Texas church who donated $42,000 of his own money to screen the film for audiences, the Associated Press reports.
However, many Jewish audiences have had an entirely different reaction to the film, claiming that not only does the movie portray Jews poorly, but also that it could ratchet up anti-Semitic actions.
"I don't have any doubt this film will cause anti-Semitism," Dov Hikind, a Democratic assemblyman from Brooklyn, N.Y., told Reuters. "I don't have any doubt that this film will result in violence."
Meanwhile, some biblical scholars have taken exception to the historical accuracy of Gibson's movie. Among the criticisms are characters who speak in Latin. According to some historians, the correct language would have been Greek. (The film is in Latin and Aramaic with English subtitles.)
More upsetting to some was the absence of historical context, Reuters reports. "The lack of context is the most devastating thing for anyone who says (the film) is faithful to the gospels because the gospels have the context," John Dominic Crossan, a professor of religious studies at De Paul University, tells Reuters.
Gibson has countered such claims saying that he sought input from numerous religious scholars and other theologians. But where the gospels were not clear, he said, he trusted his own vision. "Since the experts canceled each other out, I was thrown back on my own resources to weigh the arguments and decide for myself," he said.
Latest video
Brooke and Derek: 'Dancing''s Hottest Quarreling Couple
The pair score a 10 after a rehearsal rumble; Misty May's bittersweet goodbye
Advertisement
Today's Photos
What's Hot on People.com
Promotion
Treat Yourself! 4 Preview Issues















